Referințele folosite pentru graficele de tip termometru

Studii individuale (Figura 4):Efectele economice ale restricționării fumatului: Scollo, M., Lal, A., Hyland, A., & Glantz, S. (2003). Review of the quality of studies on the economic effects of smoke-free policies on the hospitality industry. Tobacco control, 12(1), 13-20.

Efectele bisfenolului asupra sănătății (studii pre-clinice): Vom Saal, F. S., & Hughes, C. (2005). An extensive new literature concerning low-dose effects of bisphenol A shows the need for a new risk assessment. Environmental health perspectives, 926-933.

Siguranța muncii și a mediului: Friedman, L., & Friedman, M. (2016). Financial conflicts of interest and study results in environmental and occupational health research. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 58(3), 238-247. (Abstract)

Probleme cardiovasculare (studii clinice, faza a III-a): Riaz, H., Raza, S., Khan, M. S., Riaz, I. B., & Krasuski, R. A. (2015). Impact of Funding Source on Clinical Trial Results Including Cardiovascular Outcome Trials. The American journal of cardiology, 116(12), 1944-1947.

Efectele telefoanelor mobile asupra sănătății: Huss, A., Egger, M., Hug, K., Huwiler-Müntener, K., & Röösli, M. (2008). Source of funding and results of studies of health effects of mobile phone use: systematic review of experimental studies. Environ Health Perspect; 115(1): 1–4.

Chirurgie abdominală (studii clinice): Probst, P., Knebel, P., Grummich, K., Tenckhoff, S., Ulrich, A., Büchler, M. W., & Diener, M. K. (2016). Industry bias in randomized controlled trials in general and abdominal surgery: an empirical study. Annals of surgery, 264(1), 87-92. (Abstract)

Tratamente pentru cancer (studii clinice, faza a III-a): Djulbegovic B, Kumar A, Miladinovic B, Reljic T, Galeb S, et al. (2013) Treatment Success in Cancer: Industry Compared to Publicly Sponsored Randomized Controlled Trials. PLoS ONE 8(3): e58711. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058711.

Psihiatrie (studii clinice): Kelly, R. E., Cohen, L. J., Semple, R. J., Bialer, P., Lau, A., Bodenheimer, A., … & Galynker, I. I. (2006). Relationship between drug company funding and outcomes of clinical psychiatric research. Psychological medicine, 36(11), 1647-1656. (Abstract)

Studii clinice (general): Lundh, A., Lexchin, J., Mintzes, B., Schroll, J. B., & Bero, L. (2017). Industry sponsorship and research outcome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 2. Art. No.: MR000033. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000033.pub3. (Abstract) [Sci-Hub]

Siguranța organismelor modificate genetic: Diels, J., Cunha, M., Manaia, C., Sabugosa-Madeira, B., & Silva, M. (2011). Association of financial or professional conflict of interest to research outcomes on health risks or nutritional assessment studies of genetically modified products. Food Policy, 36(2), 197-203.

Statine (studii pre-clinice): Krauth, D., Anglemyer, A., Philipps, R., & Bero, L. (2014). Nonindustry-sponsored preclinical studies on statins yield greater efficacy estimates than industry-sponsored studies: a meta-analysis. PLoS Biol, 12(1), e1001770.

Statine (studii clinice): Naci, H., Dias, S., & Ades, A. E. (2014). Industry sponsorship bias in research findings: a network meta-analysis of LDL cholesterol reduction in randomised trials of statins. BMJ : British Medical Journal, 349, g5741. doi:10.1136/bmj.g5741.

Sinbiotice, prebiotice și probiotice (studii clinice): Mugambi, M. N., Musekiwa, A., Lombard, M., Young, T., & Blaauw, R. (2013). Association between funding source, methodological quality and research outcomes in randomized controlled trials of synbiotics, probiotics and prebiotics added to infant formula: A Systematic Review. BMC medical research methodology, 13(1), 137.

Medicamente antimuscarinice (studii clinice): Tulikangas, P. K., Ayers, A., & O’Sullivan, D. M. (2006). A meta-analysis comparing trials of antimuscarinic medications funded by industry or not. BJU international, 98(2), 377-380.

Medicamente pentru artrită reumatoidă (studii clinice): Khan, N. A., Lombeida, J. I., Singh, M., Spencer, H. J., & Torralba, K. D. (2012). Association of Industry Funding with the Outcome and Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials of Drug Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 64(7), 2059–2067. doi:10.1002/art.34393

Tratamente pentru cancer de gât și cap (studii clinice): Sun, G. H., Houlton, J. J., MacEachern, M. P., Bradford, C. R. and Hayward, R. A. (2013). Influence of study sponsorship on head and neck cancer randomized trial results. Head Neck, 35: 1515–1520. doi: 10.1002/hed.23151. (Abstract)

 

Autori (Figura 9):

Sucuri îndulcite și diabet/obezitate (recenzii): Mandrioli, D., Kearns, C. E., & Bero, L. A. (2016). Relationship between research outcomes and risk of bias, study sponsorship, and author financial conflicts of interest in reviews of the effects of artificially sweetened beverages on weight outcomes: a systematic review of reviews. PloS one, 11(9), e0162198.

Osteopatie și chiropraxie pentru durere de spate (recenzii): Canter, P. H., & Ernst, E. (2005). Sources of bias in reviews of spinal manipulation for back pain. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, 117(9), 333-341. (Abstract) [Sci-Hub]

Medicină (studii clinice): Ahn Rosa, Woodbridge Alexandra, Abraham Ann, Saba Susan, Korenstein Deborah, Madden Erin et al. (2017) Financial ties of principal investigators and randomized controlled trial outcomes: cross sectional study. BMJ; 356:i6770.

Psihiatrie (studii clinice): Perlis, R. H., Perlis, C. S., Wu, Y., Hwang, C., Joseph, M., & Nierenberg, A. A. (2005). Industry sponsorship and financial conflict of interest in the reporting of clinical trials in psychiatry. The American journal of psychiatry, 162(10), 1957-1960.

Tamiflu (recenzii): Dunn, A. G., Zhou, X., Hudgins, J., Arachi, D., Mandl, K. D., Coiera, E., & Bourgeois, F. T. (2016). Financial competing interests were associated with favorable conclusions and greater author productivity in nonsystematic reviews of neuraminidase inhibitors. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 80, 43-49. (Abstract)

Cancer ocupațional (studii de cohortă): Rollin, L., Griffon, N., Darmoni, S. J. and Gehanno, J.-F. (2016), Influence of author’s affiliation and funding sources on the results of cohort studies on occupational cancer. Am. J. Ind. Med., 59: 221–226. doi:10.1002/ajim.22549. (Abstract)

Probleme cardiovasculare (studii clinice): Aneja, A., Esquitin, R., Shah, K., Iyengar, R., Nisenbaum, R., Melo, M., … & Farkouh, M. E. (2013). Authors’ self-declared financial conflicts of interest do not impact the results of major cardiovascular trials. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 61(11), 1137-1143.

 

Recenzii (Figura 11):

Sucuri îndulcite și obezitate/diabet (recenzii): Schillinger, D., Tran, J., Mangurian, C., & Kearns, C. (2016). Do sugar-sweetened beverages cause obesity and diabetes? Industry and the manufacture of scientific controversy. Annals of Internal Medicine, 165(12), 895-897. (Abstract)

Antidepresive (meta-analize): Ebrahim, S., Bance, S., Athale, A., Malachowski, C., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). Meta-analyses with industry involvement are massively published and report no caveats for antidepressants. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 70, 155-163. (Abstract)

Efectele fumatului pasiv asupra sănătății (recenzii): Barnes, D. E., & Bero, L. A. (1998). Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions. Jama, 279(19), 1566-1570. (Abstract)

Tamiflu (recenzii sistematice): Dunn, A. G., Arachi, D., Hudgins, J., Tsafnat, G., Coiera, E., & Bourgeois, F. T. (2014). Financial conflicts of interest and conclusions about neuraminidase inhibitors for influenza: an analysis of systematic reviews. Annals of internal medicine, 161(7), 513-518.

Sucuri îndulcite și obezitate (recenzii sistematice): Bes-Rastrollo M, Schulze MB, Ruiz-Canela M, Martinez-Gonzalez MA (2013). Financial Conflicts of Interest and Reporting Bias Regarding the Association between Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Weight Gain: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews. PLoS Med 10(12): e1001578. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001578.